The Game-Changing Reference Check Question You're Not Asking (But Should Be)

Optimize team management in minutes with ManageBetter. Start your free trial now and join Uber and Microsoft in boosting performance, gathering insights, and generating reviews—all AI-powered, no writing required.

Traditional reference checks often yield responses that are either overwhelmingly positive or painfully generic, failing to provide meaningful insights.

What if a single, strategically crafted question could break this mold and uncover more nuanced, constructive feedback to inform your hiring decisions? Introducing a potential game-changer:

"If I call you in a year and tell you that [candidate's name] didn't work out, what is your best guess as to why?"

This seemingly simple question is reshaping how savvy hiring managers conduct reference checks. Let's dive into why this question is uniquely powerful and how it outperforms traditional approaches.

The Power of Indirect Inquiry

Unlike standard questions that directly probe a candidate's strengths and weaknesses, this hypothetical scenario takes an indirect approach. It's this indirectness that makes it exceptionally effective.

To illustrate, let's compare it with some standard reference check questions:

  1. "What are the candidate's strengths and weaknesses?"

  2. "How would you describe the candidate's work ethic?"

  3. "Can you give an example of how the candidate handled a difficult situation?"

While these questions can provide useful information, they often elicit rehearsed or overly positive responses. Our unique question, however:

  1. Bypasses Positive Bias: References often feel obligated to give glowing reviews. This question allows them to voice concerns without feeling like they're betraying the candidate.

  2. Reveals Hidden Insights: By framing the question as a future scenario, it encourages references to share underlying concerns that may not have surfaced in the candidate's past roles.

  3. Encourages Specificity: To answer this question, references often provide concrete examples or scenarios, which are far more valuable than general statements.

A Window into the Future

Traditional reference checks focus on past performance. This question does something radically different – it asks the reference to project into the future.

  1. Uncovers Potential Issues: It reveals concerns that haven't manifested yet but could become problems in a new environment.

  2. Provides Context-Specific Insights: The question prompts references to consider how the candidate might perform in your specific workplace.

  3. Highlights Growth Areas: Responses often point to areas where the candidate may need support or development, allowing you to plan proactively.

Cultural Fit Revealed

One of the most challenging aspects of hiring is assessing cultural fit. This question excels in this area.

  1. Exposes Working Style: Responses often shed light on the candidate's work habits and how they might mesh with your team.

  2. Identifies Potential Friction Points: It can reveal mismatches between the candidate's approach and your company culture that might not be apparent from traditional questions.

Sparking Deeper Conversations

Unlike many standard reference check questions that can be answered briefly, this question opens the door to richer discussions.

  1. Provokes Thoughtful Responses: It requires more reflection than typical queries, often leading to more insightful and honest answers.

  2. Leads to Follow-Up Questions: The hypothetical scenario naturally leads to deeper, more nuanced conversations about the candidate.

How to Implement This Approach

While this question is powerful, it's important to use it wisely. Here are three examples of how to use this question in a reference check, along with nuanced and insightful dialogue:

Example 1: The High-Performer with Potential Red Flags

Interviewer: "Sarah has received glowing reviews for her technical skills. If I call you in a year and tell you that she didn't work out, what is your best guess as to why?"

Reference: "Hmm... that's an interesting question. If I had to guess, it might be due to challenges with cross-team collaboration. Sarah is brilliant, but she can sometimes get so focused on her own projects that she overlooks the bigger picture."

Interviewer: "I see. Can you give me an example of how this manifested in your organization?"

Reference: "Sure. We had a project where Sarah's team needed to coordinate closely with marketing. Sarah developed an amazing feature but didn't consult with marketing about user needs. It led to some tension and rework."

Interviewer: "How did you address this issue?"

Reference: "We implemented a cross-functional stand-up meeting. It helped, but Sarah still sometimes needed reminders to fully engage with other teams."

Example 2: The Promising Junior Candidate

Interviewer: "Alex seems to have a lot of potential. If I call you in a year and tell you that he didn't work out, what is your best guess as to why?"

Reference: "That's thoughtful of you to ask. If Alex didn't succeed, I'd guess it might be due to a lack of proactive communication. He's eager to learn but sometimes hesitates to ask for help or clarification."

Interviewer: "Interesting. How did this affect his work with you?"

Reference: "There were a couple of instances where Alex misunderstood project requirements but didn't speak up until the deadline was near. It caused some last-minute stress."

Interviewer: "How did Alex respond when this was brought to his attention?"

Reference: "He was very receptive to feedback. We worked on setting up regular check-ins, which helped significantly. Alex has improved, but it's still an area of growth for him."

Example 3: The Experienced Manager

Interviewer: "Maria has an impressive track record in leadership roles. If I call you in a year and tell you that she didn't work out, what is your best guess as to why?"

Reference: "That's a thought-provoking question. If Maria faced challenges, I suspect it might be related to adapting to a different company culture. She's very effective but has a rather direct management style that might not mesh well in all environments."

Interviewer: "Could you elaborate on what you mean by a 'direct management style'?"

Reference: "Certainly. Maria is quick to make decisions and isn't afraid to critique work that doesn't meet her standards. This drove results in our fast-paced environment, but I could see it potentially causing friction in a more consensus-driven culture."

Interviewer: "How did team members generally respond to this approach?"

Reference: "Most high-performers appreciated her clarity, but some team members found it intimidating. We worked with Maria on tailoring her approach to different team members, which she was open to and showed improvement in over time."

These examples demonstrate how this unique question can uncover nuanced insights about candidates, revealing potential areas of concern or development that might not surface through traditional questions. By prompting references to think critically about potential future scenarios, you gain a more comprehensive and realistic view of the candidate.

Conclusion: A Tool for Informed Decision-Making

In the high-stakes world of hiring, this unique question serves as a powerful tool for gaining deeper, more nuanced insights into candidates. By encouraging references to think critically and project into the future, it provides a level of insight that traditional questions simply can't match.

Remember, the goal isn't to find reasons not to hire someone, but to make the most informed decision possible. This question, when used thoughtfully, can be the key to unlocking that deeper level of understanding.

Sharpen Your Leadership Edge: Join 3,000+ executives receiving weekly, actionable insights from industry experts. Subscribe free to The Thoughtful Leader and elevate your team's performance.

Previous
Previous

4 Reasons Why 1:1 Weekly Meetings Could Be Too Much

Next
Next

4 Steps to Ask for a Better Performance Rating